Dresden & region2 min read

Housing Pressure Index Dresden

Four official indicators, one figure per district. The index shows where demand, new construction, land value and household size drift apart in Dresden — and where they do not. The formula is set out openly on this page; every figure can be recalculated.

Data 2020–202442 districts, 506,829 residentsOfficial data, open formula
housing pressure index DresdenDresden housing market districtshousing shortage Dresdenland value trend Dresdennew construction Dresden districts

Which Dresden district has the highest housing pressure?

Löbtau — 77.5 out of 100 points in the Dresden Housing Pressure Index, ahead of Neustadt (69.4) and Cotta (68.4). The index combines four official indicators per district: population change and new construction for the years 2020 to 2024, the change in land reference values from 2019 to 2024, and the share of single-person households. The most relaxed district is Weixdorf at 42.4 points; the median across all 42 districts covered is 53.3.

The index in four figures

77.5

Highest value: Löbtau. The city's strongest rise in land value (+91.3% since 2019) alongside 61.7% single-person households.

42.4

Lowest value: Weixdorf. Barely any inward migration and, at 28.9%, the smallest single-person share of all districts covered.

53.3

Median across all 42 districts. 8 districts score 60 points or more.

6,859

new dwellings completed 2020–2024 in the districts covered; across all of Dresden the figure was 10,170.

What the index measures

Four components, each normalised separately to 0–100 points, then added up with weights. Two measure quantities (people and dwellings), one measures price, one measures household structure. All four come from official sources — no estimates, no survey.

30%

Demand pressure

population change per 1,000 residents per year

Net migration plus births minus deaths — the complete balance, not just arrivals. Of the five annual figures, the trimmed mean is used: highest and lowest year removed.

More growth = more pressure

30%

Supply gap

new dwellings completed per 1,000 residents per year

The only figure that actually relieves pressure. It enters inversely: where little is built, the index value rises.

Less new build = more pressure

25%

Price dynamics

average land reference value for residential land, change in percent

Reference date 1 January 2019 against 1 January 2024, zone-weighted mean per district. Land value is the scarcity signal that becomes visible in the price — which is why it carries slightly less weight than supply and demand.

Steeper rise = more pressure

15%

Household structure

share of single-person households

The smaller the households, the more dwellings the same population needs. A slow-moving structural factor, hence the smallest weight.

More single households = more pressure

The ranking of every district

Sortable by any column. The rank column always shows the index rank, even when you sort by something else. District names link to the corresponding selling page; a second line beneath a name is the official statistical area under which the figures are kept.

Click a column heading to sort by that column.

Dresden housing pressure index, 42 districts
0 = relaxed, 100 = tightper 1,000 residents/year, 2020–2024dwellings per 1,000 residents/year, 2020–2024avg. residential land 2019 → 2024share in 2025
1LöbtauLöbtau-Nord · Löbtau-Süd77.5+9.25.35+91.3 %61.7 %21,663
2NeustadtÄußere Neustadt (Antonstadt) · Innere Neustadt69.4+5.34.52+72.3 %63.8 %26,343
3Cotta68.4+3.81.34+57.5 %57.6 %11,371
4PieschenPieschen-Süd · Pieschen-Nord/Trachenberge67.10.02.02+73.0 %59.7 %24,694
5ProhlisProhlis-Nord · Prohlis-Süd63.9+7.12.04+33.3 %57.6 %15,870
6Strehlen62.2+2.82.06+50.1 %55.9 %11,288
7Leuben61.8+6.02.53+38.1 %56.0 %12,736
8Mickten60.2+11.66.60+44.0 %54.7 %13,971
9Großzschachwitz59.4-1.10.26+46.7 %53.5 %6,196
10Reick57.4+14.85.14+9.9 %53.4 %5,605
11StriesenStriesen-Ost · Striesen-Süd · Striesen-West57.0+1.61.49+37.1 %53.6 %40,940
12JohannstadtJohannstadt-Nord · Johannstadt-Süd56.6+10.57.06+37.8 %57.3 %26,129
13Trachau55.9-0.51.13+45.2 %50.0 %9,772
14DobritzSeidnitzSeidnitz/Dobritz55.3-1.01.51+35.5 %59.2 %13,077
15GorbitzGorbitz-Süd · Gorbitz-Ost · Gorbitz-Nord/Neu-Omsewitz54.7+2.52.02+22.8 %58.8 %22,207
16CoschützGitterseeCoschütz/Gittersee54.6-2.40.88+48.3 %49.1 %5,471
17Kaditz54.3+2.54.26+46.1 %54.8 %5,631
18TolkewitzTolkewitz/Seidnitz-Nord54.2-2.00.93+41.6 %52.0 %11,224
19Lockwitz53.9+11.55.41+46.6 %31.2 %7,428
20KleinpestitzKleinpestitz/Mockritz53.6-1.60.19+35.4 %49.4 %7,355
21Naußlitz53.4+1.11.63+36.8 %47.9 %9,553
22CossebaudeCossebaude/Mobschatz/Oberwartha53.1+1.41.45+45.4 %38.8 %7,851
23GompitzAltfranken/Gompitz53.0+2.81.58+50.7 %31.1 %4,302
24Klotzsche52.9+3.12.99+37.2 %48.3 %14,701
25Briesnitz51.9-0.21.23+37.0 %45.9 %11,196
26Plauen51.7-2.50.93+36.6 %51.4 %11,338
27LangebrückLangebrück/Schönborn51.7+1.81.58+50.1 %31.8 %4,299
28Gruna51.7-2.60.72+32.2 %53.7 %12,980
29BühlauWeißer HirschBühlau/Weißer Hirsch51.1+1.61.40+36.5 %39.7 %11,317
30Laubegast50.1-6.60.74+46.2 %53.1 %11,857
31Leubnitz-Neuostra49.7+0.52.62+32.5 %50.3 %13,793
32SüdvorstadtSüdvorstadt-West · Südvorstadt-Ost49.7-5.61.39+41.8 %56.1 %23,153
33Blasewitz49.30.01.99+30.9 %48.2 %10,141
34Niedersedlitz49.0-0.71.82+41.9 %40.9 %6,060
35LoschwitzLoschwitz/Wachwitz47.6+0.52.34+37.8 %40.0 %5,716
36HellerauHellerau/Wilschdorf47.4+5.23.04+29.8 %34.2 %6,392
37Weißig47.1-2.82.28+37.6 %49.5 %5,534
38RäcknitzZschertnitzRäcknitz/Zschertnitz46.2-5.21.89+32.5 %56.2 %9,301
39Kleinzschachwitz43.7-2.71.71+34.5 %39.7 %8,316
40PillnitzHosterwitz/Pillnitz43.7-3.21.95+40.4 %38.7 %3,287
41Friedrichstadt43.0+2.811.54+58.7 %63.3 %10,868
42Weixdorf42.4-2.71.29+41.6 %28.9 %5,903

Notes on individual rows

  • Löbtau, Neustadt, Prohlis, Reick, Friedrichstadt: Between the two land-value reference dates, zones were split or merged, which blurs the change.
  • Prohlis, Strehlen, Südvorstadt, Friedrichstadt: One single year deviates sharply (2020/21 pandemic, 2022 refugee movement). The value is trimmed, but some of the one-off effect may remain.
  • Prohlis, Reick, Friedrichstadt: The price component rests on fewer than four land-value zones and is correspondingly fragile.
  • Prohlis: One sub-area has no residential land at the earlier reference date and stays out of the price component.

Three findings I would not have expected

What the figures say

  1. 1

    Pressure does not sit in the most expensive locations. Blasewitz carries one of the city's highest land values at €678/m² as of 1 January 2024 and lands at rank 33. Loschwitz follows at rank 35. The tight areas are the Wilhelminian belt instead: Löbtau and Cotta in the west, Pieschen in the north-west — three of the first four places.

  2. 2

    Where building happens, the index visibly falls. Friedrichstadt has one of the steepest rises in land value (+58.7%) and, at 63.3%, close to the city's highest single-person share. It still sits at rank 41, second to last. The reason is 627 new dwellings completed in five years, 11.54 per 1,000 residents per year — more than six times the median.

  3. 3

    Inward migration alone creates no pressure. Reick has the strongest growth of any district at +14.8 per 1,000 residents and still only reaches rank 10, because building went on there at the same time. At the other end: Kleinpestitz saw 7 new dwellings in five years — for 7,355 residents.

For owners the second finding is the one to act on: a steep rise in land value in your own district says little on its own about the selling situation. Only together with the construction figure does it become a statement.

What the figure cannot do

An index whose weaknesses you do not know is more dangerous than no index at all. So here, in full, is what this one does not deliver.

  • It measures tightness, not price level

    A high value means demand and supply are drifting apart. It does not mean the district is expensive. Dresden's most expensive locations sit mid-table, because neither much inward migration nor much construction happens there.

  • The year 2022 distorts the migration data

    The refugee movement from Ukraine fed through to migration balances across the city, concentrated in districts with communal accommodation and vacant prefab stock. The trimmed mean removes the outlier year. One doubtful case remains: Prohlis sits at rank 5 although the district holds the city's largest housing reserve. Part of the arrivals in the years after are likely to be accommodation rather than the private housing market. Anyone citing the index should cite that row with the caveat.

  • Innere Altstadt is missing

    The valuation committee records only mixed-use zones there, no residential land. The price component could not be calculated comparably, so Innere Altstadt (3,133 residents) stays outside the ranking rather than inside it with a substitute figure.

  • Nine statistical districts are not covered

    The index covers 506,829 of Dresden's 571,510 residents. Areas without their own district page are not included, mostly the inner suburbs and Albertstadt: Albertstadt, Gönnsdorf/Pappritz, Innere Altstadt, Leipziger Vorstadt, Pirnaische Vorstadt, Radeberger Vorstadt, Schönfeld/Schullwitz, Seevorstadt-Ost, Wilsdruffer Vorstadt/Seevorstadt-West.

  • Housing vacancy is missing as a component

    It would be the most direct measure of pressure there is. For Dresden's districts it is not available at that spatial detail — unlike for the surrounding municipalities, where the 2022 census reports it per municipality. The supply side is therefore represented through new construction.

  • Three price series rest on a thin basis

    In Reick, Prohlis and Friedrichstadt the change in land value rests on fewer than four zones. Those rows are marked in the table. Reick is the extreme case: two zones at the earlier reference date, three at the later one.

  • Four rows combine two districts each

    Coschütz and Gittersee, Seidnitz and Dobritz, Bühlau and Weißer Hirsch, Räcknitz and Zschertnitz are recorded jointly by the statistics office. Separate rows with identical figures would be false precision.

How to recalculate it

Each component is stretched across all 42 districts by min-max scaling to 0–100 points: the lowest raw value gets 0, the highest 100, everything in between linearly. For the supply gap the scale is reversed. Then:

Index = 0.30 · demand + 0.30 · supply + 0.25 · price + 0.15 · households
ComponentRaw measurePeriodWeight
Demand pressurepopulation change per 1,000 residents per year2020–202430%
Supply gapnew dwellings completed per 1,000 residents per year2020–202430%
Price dynamicsaverage land reference value for residential land, change in percent01.01.2019 → 01.01.202425%
Household structureshare of single-person households202515%

An example: Löbtau, rank 1

Demand of +9.2 per 1,000 residents gives 73.6 points, new build of 5.35 per 1,000 gives 54.5 points (inverse), land value of +91.3% gives 100.0 points, single-person households at 61.7% give 94.0 points. Weighted: 0.30 · 73.6 + 0.30 · 54.5 + 0.25 · 100.0 + 0.15 · 94.0 = 77.5.

Cross-check

The sum of completed new dwellings across all statistical districts for 2020–2024 comes to exactly 10,170 — the same figure the city statistics office reports as the total. If the two do not match, the generator aborts instead of producing a table.

Sources

  • Population, migration, births and deaths as well as single-person households: municipal statistics office of the City of Dresden, open data portal, as of 2025.
  • Completed new dwellings and construction backlog: Statistical bulletin „Bauen und Wohnen 2024“ (Building and housing), Municipal statistics office of the City of Dresden, data basis Statistical Office of the Free State of Saxony.
  • Land reference values: Gutachterausschuss für Grundstückswerte Dresden (Landeshauptstadt Dresden, Kommunale Statistikstelle), Datenlizenz Deutschland – Namensnennung – Version 2.0 (dl-de/by-2-0).

If you only want the land values themselves — level, range and trajectory per district since 1992 — they are on the Dresden land reference value page. That is a price overview built on a single indicator. The housing pressure index answers a different question and uses land value as just one of four ingredients.

Citation welcome

The index may be freely quoted and reused with attribution: “Dresden Housing Pressure Index, Immobilienpartner Sachsen”. For newsrooms I supply the raw values as a table on request, including the annual figures behind the demand component.

What does this mean for owners?

The practical question is not whether your district sits at the top or the bottom, but which of the four components puts it there. A high value driven by price dynamics and scarce new build is a good selling position. A high value driven mainly by inward migration into a district with a housing reserve is not.

I see both regularly in selling conversations: owners in the west who underrate their location because they measure it against Blasewitz — and owners on the edge of the city who draw the wrong conclusion from a headline about rising land values.

The concrete next step is on the selling pages: sell a house in Dresden, sell an apartment in Dresden, estate agent in Dresden. In the table above, each district name links straight to the selling page for that neighbourhood.

Verified & trusted

5.0 · 43 Google reviewsProvenExpert review seal for Immobilienpartner Sachsen — overall rating “very good”
Licensed under § 34c GewOCity of Dresden
Member of IHK DresdenChamber of Industry & Commerce

Free valuation of your property

Receive a first well-founded estimate within 24 hours, based on current market data and our many years of experience.

Frequently asked questions

Which Dresden district has the highest housing pressure index?
Löbtau, with 77.5 out of 100 points. Neustadt (69.4), Cotta (68.4) and Pieschen (67.1) follow — three Wilhelminian districts plus Neustadt. Eight of the 42 districts covered reach 60 points or more, the median is 53.3, and Weixdorf brings up the rear at 42.4.
Why does Friedrichstadt rank second to last despite sharply rising land values?
Because building is happening there. Between 2020 and 2024, Friedrichstadt saw 627 new dwellings completed, which is 11.54 per 1,000 residents per year — more than six times the Dresden district median of 1.85. The supply component enters the index inversely with a weight of 30 percent and pushes Friedrichstadt down to rank 41 despite a 58.7 percent rise in land value.
How is the housing pressure index weighted, and can it be recalculated?
Index = 0.30 times demand pressure + 0.30 times supply gap + 0.25 times price dynamics + 0.15 times household structure. Each component is first stretched to 0–100 points by min-max scaling across all 42 districts, with the supply gap on a reversed scale. Raw values, point values and the five annual figures behind the demand component are shown in the ranking and in the data file — the calculation can be followed step by step.
Why is Innere Altstadt missing from the ranking?
In Innere Altstadt the valuation committee for land values records only zones for mixed-use land, no residential land. The price component there would not be comparable with the other districts. Innere Altstadt and its 3,133 residents therefore stay outside the ranking rather than appearing in the table with a substitute figure.
CallWhatsAppConsultation