Which Dresden district has the highest housing pressure?
The index in four figures
Highest value: Löbtau. The city's strongest rise in land value (+91.3% since 2019) alongside 61.7% single-person households.
Lowest value: Weixdorf. Barely any inward migration and, at 28.9%, the smallest single-person share of all districts covered.
Median across all 42 districts. 8 districts score 60 points or more.
new dwellings completed 2020–2024 in the districts covered; across all of Dresden the figure was 10,170.
What the index measures
Four components, each normalised separately to 0–100 points, then added up with weights. Two measure quantities (people and dwellings), one measures price, one measures household structure. All four come from official sources — no estimates, no survey.
Demand pressure
population change per 1,000 residents per year
Net migration plus births minus deaths — the complete balance, not just arrivals. Of the five annual figures, the trimmed mean is used: highest and lowest year removed.
More growth = more pressure
Supply gap
new dwellings completed per 1,000 residents per year
The only figure that actually relieves pressure. It enters inversely: where little is built, the index value rises.
Less new build = more pressure
Price dynamics
average land reference value for residential land, change in percent
Reference date 1 January 2019 against 1 January 2024, zone-weighted mean per district. Land value is the scarcity signal that becomes visible in the price — which is why it carries slightly less weight than supply and demand.
Steeper rise = more pressure
Household structure
share of single-person households
The smaller the households, the more dwellings the same population needs. A slow-moving structural factor, hence the smallest weight.
More single households = more pressure
The ranking of every district
Sortable by any column. The rank column always shows the index rank, even when you sort by something else. District names link to the corresponding selling page; a second line beneath a name is the official statistical area under which the figures are kept.
Click a column heading to sort by that column.
| 0 = relaxed, 100 = tight | per 1,000 residents/year, 2020–2024 | dwellings per 1,000 residents/year, 2020–2024 | avg. residential land 2019 → 2024 | share in 2025 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LöbtauLöbtau-Nord · Löbtau-Süd | 77.5 | +9.2 | 5.35 | +91.3 % | 61.7 % | 21,663 |
| 2 | NeustadtÄußere Neustadt (Antonstadt) · Innere Neustadt | 69.4 | +5.3 | 4.52 | +72.3 % | 63.8 % | 26,343 |
| 3 | Cotta | 68.4 | +3.8 | 1.34 | +57.5 % | 57.6 % | 11,371 |
| 4 | PieschenPieschen-Süd · Pieschen-Nord/Trachenberge | 67.1 | 0.0 | 2.02 | +73.0 % | 59.7 % | 24,694 |
| 5 | ProhlisProhlis-Nord · Prohlis-Süd | 63.9 | +7.1 | 2.04 | +33.3 % | 57.6 % | 15,870 |
| 6 | Strehlen | 62.2 | +2.8 | 2.06 | +50.1 % | 55.9 % | 11,288 |
| 7 | Leuben | 61.8 | +6.0 | 2.53 | +38.1 % | 56.0 % | 12,736 |
| 8 | Mickten | 60.2 | +11.6 | 6.60 | +44.0 % | 54.7 % | 13,971 |
| 9 | Großzschachwitz | 59.4 | -1.1 | 0.26 | +46.7 % | 53.5 % | 6,196 |
| 10 | Reick | 57.4 | +14.8 | 5.14 | +9.9 % | 53.4 % | 5,605 |
| 11 | StriesenStriesen-Ost · Striesen-Süd · Striesen-West | 57.0 | +1.6 | 1.49 | +37.1 % | 53.6 % | 40,940 |
| 12 | JohannstadtJohannstadt-Nord · Johannstadt-Süd | 56.6 | +10.5 | 7.06 | +37.8 % | 57.3 % | 26,129 |
| 13 | Trachau | 55.9 | -0.5 | 1.13 | +45.2 % | 50.0 % | 9,772 |
| 14 | DobritzSeidnitzSeidnitz/Dobritz | 55.3 | -1.0 | 1.51 | +35.5 % | 59.2 % | 13,077 |
| 15 | GorbitzGorbitz-Süd · Gorbitz-Ost · Gorbitz-Nord/Neu-Omsewitz | 54.7 | +2.5 | 2.02 | +22.8 % | 58.8 % | 22,207 |
| 16 | CoschützGitterseeCoschütz/Gittersee | 54.6 | -2.4 | 0.88 | +48.3 % | 49.1 % | 5,471 |
| 17 | Kaditz | 54.3 | +2.5 | 4.26 | +46.1 % | 54.8 % | 5,631 |
| 18 | TolkewitzTolkewitz/Seidnitz-Nord | 54.2 | -2.0 | 0.93 | +41.6 % | 52.0 % | 11,224 |
| 19 | Lockwitz | 53.9 | +11.5 | 5.41 | +46.6 % | 31.2 % | 7,428 |
| 20 | KleinpestitzKleinpestitz/Mockritz | 53.6 | -1.6 | 0.19 | +35.4 % | 49.4 % | 7,355 |
| 21 | Naußlitz | 53.4 | +1.1 | 1.63 | +36.8 % | 47.9 % | 9,553 |
| 22 | CossebaudeCossebaude/Mobschatz/Oberwartha | 53.1 | +1.4 | 1.45 | +45.4 % | 38.8 % | 7,851 |
| 23 | GompitzAltfranken/Gompitz | 53.0 | +2.8 | 1.58 | +50.7 % | 31.1 % | 4,302 |
| 24 | Klotzsche | 52.9 | +3.1 | 2.99 | +37.2 % | 48.3 % | 14,701 |
| 25 | Briesnitz | 51.9 | -0.2 | 1.23 | +37.0 % | 45.9 % | 11,196 |
| 26 | Plauen | 51.7 | -2.5 | 0.93 | +36.6 % | 51.4 % | 11,338 |
| 27 | LangebrückLangebrück/Schönborn | 51.7 | +1.8 | 1.58 | +50.1 % | 31.8 % | 4,299 |
| 28 | Gruna | 51.7 | -2.6 | 0.72 | +32.2 % | 53.7 % | 12,980 |
| 29 | BühlauWeißer HirschBühlau/Weißer Hirsch | 51.1 | +1.6 | 1.40 | +36.5 % | 39.7 % | 11,317 |
| 30 | Laubegast | 50.1 | -6.6 | 0.74 | +46.2 % | 53.1 % | 11,857 |
| 31 | Leubnitz-Neuostra | 49.7 | +0.5 | 2.62 | +32.5 % | 50.3 % | 13,793 |
| 32 | SüdvorstadtSüdvorstadt-West · Südvorstadt-Ost | 49.7 | -5.6 | 1.39 | +41.8 % | 56.1 % | 23,153 |
| 33 | Blasewitz | 49.3 | 0.0 | 1.99 | +30.9 % | 48.2 % | 10,141 |
| 34 | Niedersedlitz | 49.0 | -0.7 | 1.82 | +41.9 % | 40.9 % | 6,060 |
| 35 | LoschwitzLoschwitz/Wachwitz | 47.6 | +0.5 | 2.34 | +37.8 % | 40.0 % | 5,716 |
| 36 | HellerauHellerau/Wilschdorf | 47.4 | +5.2 | 3.04 | +29.8 % | 34.2 % | 6,392 |
| 37 | Weißig | 47.1 | -2.8 | 2.28 | +37.6 % | 49.5 % | 5,534 |
| 38 | RäcknitzZschertnitzRäcknitz/Zschertnitz | 46.2 | -5.2 | 1.89 | +32.5 % | 56.2 % | 9,301 |
| 39 | Kleinzschachwitz | 43.7 | -2.7 | 1.71 | +34.5 % | 39.7 % | 8,316 |
| 40 | PillnitzHosterwitz/Pillnitz | 43.7 | -3.2 | 1.95 | +40.4 % | 38.7 % | 3,287 |
| 41 | Friedrichstadt | 43.0 | +2.8 | 11.54 | +58.7 % | 63.3 % | 10,868 |
| 42 | Weixdorf | 42.4 | -2.7 | 1.29 | +41.6 % | 28.9 % | 5,903 |
Notes on individual rows
- Löbtau, Neustadt, Prohlis, Reick, Friedrichstadt: Between the two land-value reference dates, zones were split or merged, which blurs the change.
- Prohlis, Strehlen, Südvorstadt, Friedrichstadt: One single year deviates sharply (2020/21 pandemic, 2022 refugee movement). The value is trimmed, but some of the one-off effect may remain.
- Prohlis, Reick, Friedrichstadt: The price component rests on fewer than four land-value zones and is correspondingly fragile.
- Prohlis: One sub-area has no residential land at the earlier reference date and stays out of the price component.
Three findings I would not have expected
What the figures say
- 1
Pressure does not sit in the most expensive locations. Blasewitz carries one of the city's highest land values at €678/m² as of 1 January 2024 and lands at rank 33. Loschwitz follows at rank 35. The tight areas are the Wilhelminian belt instead: Löbtau and Cotta in the west, Pieschen in the north-west — three of the first four places.
- 2
Where building happens, the index visibly falls. Friedrichstadt has one of the steepest rises in land value (+58.7%) and, at 63.3%, close to the city's highest single-person share. It still sits at rank 41, second to last. The reason is 627 new dwellings completed in five years, 11.54 per 1,000 residents per year — more than six times the median.
- 3
Inward migration alone creates no pressure. Reick has the strongest growth of any district at +14.8 per 1,000 residents and still only reaches rank 10, because building went on there at the same time. At the other end: Kleinpestitz saw 7 new dwellings in five years — for 7,355 residents.
For owners the second finding is the one to act on: a steep rise in land value in your own district says little on its own about the selling situation. Only together with the construction figure does it become a statement.
What the figure cannot do
An index whose weaknesses you do not know is more dangerous than no index at all. So here, in full, is what this one does not deliver.
It measures tightness, not price level
A high value means demand and supply are drifting apart. It does not mean the district is expensive. Dresden's most expensive locations sit mid-table, because neither much inward migration nor much construction happens there.
The year 2022 distorts the migration data
The refugee movement from Ukraine fed through to migration balances across the city, concentrated in districts with communal accommodation and vacant prefab stock. The trimmed mean removes the outlier year. One doubtful case remains: Prohlis sits at rank 5 although the district holds the city's largest housing reserve. Part of the arrivals in the years after are likely to be accommodation rather than the private housing market. Anyone citing the index should cite that row with the caveat.
Innere Altstadt is missing
The valuation committee records only mixed-use zones there, no residential land. The price component could not be calculated comparably, so Innere Altstadt (3,133 residents) stays outside the ranking rather than inside it with a substitute figure.
Nine statistical districts are not covered
The index covers 506,829 of Dresden's 571,510 residents. Areas without their own district page are not included, mostly the inner suburbs and Albertstadt: Albertstadt, Gönnsdorf/Pappritz, Innere Altstadt, Leipziger Vorstadt, Pirnaische Vorstadt, Radeberger Vorstadt, Schönfeld/Schullwitz, Seevorstadt-Ost, Wilsdruffer Vorstadt/Seevorstadt-West.
Housing vacancy is missing as a component
It would be the most direct measure of pressure there is. For Dresden's districts it is not available at that spatial detail — unlike for the surrounding municipalities, where the 2022 census reports it per municipality. The supply side is therefore represented through new construction.
Three price series rest on a thin basis
In Reick, Prohlis and Friedrichstadt the change in land value rests on fewer than four zones. Those rows are marked in the table. Reick is the extreme case: two zones at the earlier reference date, three at the later one.
Four rows combine two districts each
Coschütz and Gittersee, Seidnitz and Dobritz, Bühlau and Weißer Hirsch, Räcknitz and Zschertnitz are recorded jointly by the statistics office. Separate rows with identical figures would be false precision.
How to recalculate it
Each component is stretched across all 42 districts by min-max scaling to 0–100 points: the lowest raw value gets 0, the highest 100, everything in between linearly. For the supply gap the scale is reversed. Then:
| Component | Raw measure | Period | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demand pressure | population change per 1,000 residents per year | 2020–2024 | 30% |
| Supply gap | new dwellings completed per 1,000 residents per year | 2020–2024 | 30% |
| Price dynamics | average land reference value for residential land, change in percent | 01.01.2019 → 01.01.2024 | 25% |
| Household structure | share of single-person households | 2025 | 15% |
An example: Löbtau, rank 1
Demand of +9.2 per 1,000 residents gives 73.6 points, new build of 5.35 per 1,000 gives 54.5 points (inverse), land value of +91.3% gives 100.0 points, single-person households at 61.7% give 94.0 points. Weighted: 0.30 · 73.6 + 0.30 · 54.5 + 0.25 · 100.0 + 0.15 · 94.0 = 77.5.
Cross-check
The sum of completed new dwellings across all statistical districts for 2020–2024 comes to exactly 10,170 — the same figure the city statistics office reports as the total. If the two do not match, the generator aborts instead of producing a table.
Sources
- Population, migration, births and deaths as well as single-person households: municipal statistics office of the City of Dresden, open data portal, as of 2025.
- Completed new dwellings and construction backlog: Statistical bulletin „Bauen und Wohnen 2024“ (Building and housing), Municipal statistics office of the City of Dresden, data basis Statistical Office of the Free State of Saxony.
- Land reference values: Gutachterausschuss für Grundstückswerte Dresden (Landeshauptstadt Dresden, Kommunale Statistikstelle), Datenlizenz Deutschland – Namensnennung – Version 2.0 (dl-de/by-2-0).
If you only want the land values themselves — level, range and trajectory per district since 1992 — they are on the Dresden land reference value page. That is a price overview built on a single indicator. The housing pressure index answers a different question and uses land value as just one of four ingredients.
Citation welcome
The index may be freely quoted and reused with attribution: “Dresden Housing Pressure Index, Immobilienpartner Sachsen”. For newsrooms I supply the raw values as a table on request, including the annual figures behind the demand component.
What does this mean for owners?
The practical question is not whether your district sits at the top or the bottom, but which of the four components puts it there. A high value driven by price dynamics and scarce new build is a good selling position. A high value driven mainly by inward migration into a district with a housing reserve is not.
The concrete next step is on the selling pages: sell a house in Dresden, sell an apartment in Dresden, estate agent in Dresden. In the table above, each district name links straight to the selling page for that neighbourhood.
You might also be interested in
About this data — methodology & sources
How the neighbourhood data behind 'Living in Dresden' is produced: source, method and date for every data point — transparent, neutral, ad-free.
Altstadt Dresden property market: prices and structure
The Innere Altstadt district in Dresden: location, population trend, age structure and quality of living at a glance — plus how to sell a flat or house here.
Blasewitz Dresden property market: prices and structure
The Blasewitz district in Dresden: location, population trend, age structure and quality of living at a glance — plus how to sell a flat or house here.
Verified & trusted

Free valuation of your property
Receive a first well-founded estimate within 24 hours, based on current market data and our many years of experience.
